Smart research. Smart business.  
      
      CEH Report :
 
Table of Contents
 
Summary
Introduction
Environmental Issues
Manufacturing Processes
Silver Catalyst Processes
Metal Oxide Processes
Supply and Demand by Region
United States
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Production
Consumption
Urea-Formaldehyde Resins
Wood adhesives
Glass fiber roofing mats
Other
Phenol-Formaldehyde Resins
Wood adhesives
Insulation
Laminates
Foundry materials
Molding compounds
Other
Polyacetal Resins
Methylenebis(4-phenyl isocyanate)
1,4-Butanediol
Melamine-Formaldehyde Resins
Controlled-Release Fertilizers
Pentaerythritol
Hexamethylenetetramine
Producing companies
Salient statistics
Consumption
Other
Chelating agents
Paraformaldehyde
Trimethylolpropane
Herbicides
Pyridines
Neopentyl glycol
Nitroparaffin derivatives
Textile chemicals
Trimethylolethane
Other
Price
Trade
Canada
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Mexico
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Central and South America
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Western Europe
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Urea-, Phenol- and Melamine-Formaldehyde Resins
Polyacetal Resins
1,4-Butanediol
Methylenebis(4-phenyl isocyanate)
Pentaerythritol
Trimethylolpropane
Hexamethylenetetramine
Other
Price
Trade
Central and Eastern Europe
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Middle East
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Japan
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Polyacetal Resins
Urea-, Phenol- and Melamine-Formaldehyde Resins
Methylenebis(4-phenyl isocyanate)
Paraformaldehyde
Pentaerythritol
Other
1,4-Butanediol
Trimethylolpropane and neopentyl glycol
Hexamethylenetetramine
Miscellaneous
Price
Trade
Other Asia
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
Other Regions
Producing Companies
Salient Statistics
Consumption
   
  Formaldehyde
   
  Sebastian Bizzari
  Published March 2007
  CEH Home   |     View Report   |     Purchase      
   
 
  Abstract
   
 

World consumption of 37% formaldehyde was about 28 million metric tons in 2006, up from 24 million metric tons in 2003. Between 2003 and 2006, world capacity grew at an average annual rate of 3.9%, while world consumption grew at an average annual rate of 5.4%.

Formaldehyde is the most commercially important aldehyde. Urea-, phenol- and melamine-formaldehyde resins (UF, PF and MF resins) accounted for nearly 63% of world demand for formaldehyde in 2006; other large applications include polyacetal resins, pentaerythritol, methylenebis(4-phenyl isocyanate) (MDI), 1,4-butanediol (BDO) and hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA). Most formaldehyde producers are concerned primarily with satisfying captive requirements for derivatives and/or supplying local merchant sales. Formaldehyde is usually produced close to the point of consumption since it is fairly easy to make, is costly to transport and can develop problems associated with stability during transport. As a result, world trade in formaldehyde is minimal and accounted for approximately 2% of production in 2006.

Construction/remodeling activity, vehicle and furniture production, and original equipment manufacture (OEM) account for most world consumption of formaldehyde. Demand in these markets is greatly influenced by general economic conditions. As a result, demand for formaldehyde largely follows the patterns of the leading world economies. Formaldehyde resins are used predominantly in the wood products industry as adhesives. Growth of these resins is strongly correlated with construction/remodeling activity, which accounts for over 50% of consumption, and to a lesser degree, the automotive industry.

The following pie chart shows consumption of formaldehyde by end use:


Concern over possible human carcinogenicity of formaldehyde has been a controversial issue. Many studies assessing the human risk of low-level exposure to formaldehyde have been conducted; interpretation of study findings has been varied. The lack of conclusive evidence has led to widespread disagreement among industry, government agencies and unions regarding the appropriate risk assessment of formaldehyde.

In 1987, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) adopted a comprehensive formaldehyde workplace standard of one ppm permissible exposure limit (PEL) based on an eight-hour time-weighted average (TWA). A fifteen-minute short-term exposure limit (STEL) of 2 ppm and an “action level” of 0.5 ppm were also adopted. A number of ancillary requirements, including exposure monitoring, medical surveillance, hazard communication, training and respiratory protection, were also established. In 1992, the PEL was reduced to 0.75 ppm on an eight-hour TWA. Medical removal protection (MRP) provisions were added for employees claiming certain adverse effects of formaldehyde exposure. In those cases, MRP is triggered only after careful delineation of symptoms and consideration of job transfer alternatives prior to employee removal. The 1992 amended standard also changed the formaldehyde labeling requirements. Labels containing a warning that formaldehyde presents a potential cancer hazard are necessary only for products where formaldehyde levels may potentially exceed 0.5 ppm.

Additionally, in response to a 1985 federal regulation by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, both wood adhesive and pressed wood products manufacturers modified production techniques to reduce formaldehyde off-gassing. Formaldehyde levels in homes have dropped significantly and, at current levels, below 0.1 ppm, health concerns are negligible.

 

 
Company Information
 

Copyright © 2009 SRI Consulting. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Contact Us